GrantedDecided 17 October 2019Offaly County Council

IDA BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY PARK, SRAGH, TULLAMORE CO OFFALY

Planning application 19374
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 October 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Offaly County Council.
I). THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW EXTENSION (608M2) TO THE REAR OF EXISTING FACILITY TO INCLUDE WAREHOUSING, LABORATORY, PLANT ROOM AND ANCILLARY ACCOMMODATION AND ALL ANCILLARY WORKS. II). CONSTRUCTION OF A DEPRESSED LOADING DOCK AND CANOPY, SERVICE YARD AND GAS STORAGE AREA AND ASSOCIATED PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, III). SEPARATE STANDALONE ESB SUBSTATION AND SWITCH ROOM (32M2) AND A GENERATOR ENCLOSURE AND BUNDED FUEL TANK IV). NEW BOUNDARY FENCING AND ENTRANCE GATES. V). NEW WINDOWS TO SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Offaly has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near IDA BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY PARK, SRAGH, TULLAMORE CO OFFALY?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →