GrantedDecided 11 December 2019Offaly County Council

CHURCH ROAD, TULLAMORE, CO. OFFALY

Planning application 1996
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 December 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Offaly County Council.
MATTHEW KANE MEMORIAL AT RIVERESIDE ROAD AND PERMISSION FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ON SITE AND ERECTION OF RETAIL-LED, MIXED USE TOWN CENTRE DEVELOPMENT ON AN APPROX. 4.25 HA BROWNFIELD SITE, INCLUDING; BLOCK A 2-STOREY RETAIL BUILDING, BLOCK B COMPRISING 2-3 STOREY RETAIL, CAFÉ/ RESTAURANT AND 8 RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS, BLOCK C SINGLE STOREY RETAIL BUILDING; BLOCK D CINEMA, BLOCK E SINGLE STOREY RETAIL UNIT WITH ATTACHED GARDEN CENTRE, ACCESS, ACCESS ROADS, CAR AND CYCLE PARKING, PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES/ PATHS, RIVERSIDE WALKWAY, HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING AND STREET FURNITURE, SUDS POND, FOUL SEWER PUMPING STATION AND ASSOICATED PUMP HOUSE, ESB SUB-STATIONS AND SWITCHROOMS AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE DEVELOPMENT WORKS TO COMPLETE THE DEVELOPMENT; THE APPLICATION IS ACCOMPANIED BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT (EIAR)

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Offaly has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near CHURCH ROAD, TULLAMORE, CO. OFFALY?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →