GrantedDecided 01 August 2019Roscommon County Council

Ratra, Tibohine, Castlerea

Planning application 19309
DecisionConditional grant
Decided01 August 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Roscommon County Council.
To retain the following:1) Office building with stores and workshop circa 406.5 sq.m. 2) Parts Storage Shed circa 47.2 sq.m. 3) Barn for compressor and equipment circa 39.1 sq.m. 4) Large workshop and shed circa 928.5 sq.m. 5) Storage shed for used machinery parts circa 372.4 sq.m.6) Portacabins circa 35sq.m. 7) Insitu Shipping Containers circa 124 sq.m. 8) Change of use of land from agricultural to commercial use for keeping and parking machinery on and all ancillary wash down bays, pits, petrol interceptors, concrete yard, perimeter fencing, septic tank and all other ancillary site works at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Roscommon has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Ratra, Tibohine, Castlerea?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →