RefusedDecided 22 November 2019Roscommon County Council

Cooladye Td, Cootehall, Boyle

Planning application 19522
DecisionRefused
Decided22 November 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Roscommon County Council.
To partially retain and partially remove as constructed garage which is at variance to the garage permitted under Grant of Planning PD13/397 with associated site development works at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ASP-306152-19Submitted 16 December 2019 / decided 24 March 2020
Status not recordedREFUSED
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ASP-306152-19
    16 December 2019
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSED
    24 March 2020
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Roscommon has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cooladye Td, Cootehall, Boyle?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →