GrantedDecided 11 December 2020Roscommon County Council

Rockingham Stable Building Kingston Hall, Rockingham Demesne, Boyle

Planning application 20324
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 December 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Roscommon County Council.
For conservation and development work to Protected Structure, RPS: 00600311 for use as a dwelling house, including reinstatement of roof with addition of a roof light on ridge and new flue, provision of new rainwater goods, removal of one internal wall, provision of new windows/doors to existing opes, provision of new floor and internal partition walls, provision of new vehicular entrance, onsite waste water treatment system, domestic shed with home office and all associated works at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Roscommon has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Rockingham Stable Building Kingston Hall, Rockingham Demesne, Boyle?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →