GrantedDecided 31 January 2025Roscommon County Council

Oakport Road, Cootehall, Co. Roscommon

Planning application 2460561
DecisionConditional grant
Decided31 January 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Roscommon County Council.
Permission for the renovation of the two storey detached house with rear ground and first-floor extensions. The scope includes an open-plan kitchen and dining area, front porch replacement, selective partition removal, floor upgrades with underfloor heating, and replacement of all doors and windows. A rear groundfloor extension with a flat roof and Velux roof-lights and a first-floor extension with a pitched roof will be added. Exterior work features timber cladding and a patio for improved outdoor connectivity, integrating smoothly with the existing structure at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Roscommon has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Oakport Road, Cootehall, Co. Roscommon?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →