GrantedDecided 31 August 2018Sligo County Council

10 Springhill Close, Rosses Upper, Rosses Point

Planning application 18273
DecisionConditional grant
Decided31 August 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Sligo County Council.
Development consisting refurbishment and reconfiguration of the existing dwelling ground floor to include: construction of an extension to the front of the existing integrated garage, extension of the existing porch area and new entrance canopy to the front of the existing dwelling, removal of existing pebble dash and plaster quoin stones and re-plastering of the existing dwelling externally, alterations to existing ground floor windows/openings, installation of additional ground floor window in the existing side elevation and all associated site works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Sligo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 10 Springhill Close, Rosses Upper, Rosses Point?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →