GrantedDecided 06 April 2020Sligo County Council

Rathmore, Ballincarrow, Ballymote

Planning application 19170
DecisionConditional grant
Decided06 April 2020
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Sligo County Council.
For retention of development consisting of (a) Retain additional floor area added to existing dwelling house 32 sq.m in floor area (b) Retain alterations to elevations of existing dwelling house which includes the following, (i). Retention of windows to front elevation, (ii). Retention of windows to rear elevation, (iii). Retention of windows to side elevation. (c) Retain existing domestic garage as constructed on site, (d) Retain dwelling house and garage at revised location on site (e) Retain amended site boundaries together with all ancillary site works and services (Previous Planning reference PL 01/490),

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Sligo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Rathmore, Ballincarrow, Ballymote?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →