GrantedDecided 20 December 2019Sligo County Council

Hopes and Dreams Montessori School, 29 Cartron Heights, Sligo

Planning application 19461
DecisionConditional grant
Decided20 December 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Sligo County Council.
Development consisting of the following: (1) Permission for retention of single storey playroom extension (11m2) to rear of existing creche and retention of change of use of first floor of property from single residential unit (42m2) as previously permitted under PD 4627 to creche with associated works. (2) Permission to amend the terms of current Planning Permission Reference PD 4627, by removing Condition no. 2, so that the numbers of children allowed to attend the creche is not limited by condition or Planning Permission

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Sligo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Hopes and Dreams Montessori School, 29 Cartron Heights, Sligo?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →