GrantedDecided 22 December 2025Sligo County Council

Cashel, Cloonloo, Co. Sligo

Planning application 2560298
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 December 2025
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Sligo County Council.
Agricultural outbuilding for use as a store and workshop (floor area 231.58 sq.mtrs.). Agricultural outbuilding for use as general storage ancillary to the working of my farm (floor area 160 sq.mtrs.). Agricultural outbuilding for use as general storage ancillary to the working of my farm (floor area 96 sq.mtrs.). The renovation and extension of existing cottage including part demolition of the front elevation and demolition of the rear elevation and the construction of an extension to the front of cottage (29.5 sq.mtrs.) and to the rear of cottage 68.1 sq.mtrs.), together with ancillary site works and services

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Sligo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cashel, Cloonloo, Co. Sligo?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →