GrantedDecided 12 May 2026Sligo County Council

Grattan Lodge, Ballyweelin, Rosses Point Co. Sligo

Planning application 2660120
DecisionConditional grant
Decided12 May 2026
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Sligo County Council.
- Retention Permission for extensions to existing dwelling and material alterations as constructed,- Retention of 1 domestic garden steel storage shed as constructed with a gross area of 14.35m2 located to north-east of existing dwelling along with ancillary works. Previous Planning Register Number: PL6400/76.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Sligo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Grattan Lodge, Ballyweelin, Rosses Point Co. Sligo?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →