RefusedDecided 10 December 2003South Dublin County Council

2, Manor Park, Palmerstown, Dublin 20

Planning application SD02A/0627
DecisionRefuse outline permission
Decided10 December 2003
Application typeOutline Permission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
2 bed bungalow to include related site works and new access gate to Wood Farm Avenue at rear.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
06s.201484Submitted 31 December 2002 / decided 11 April 2003
Appeal decidedRefuse Permission
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference 06s.201484
    31 December 2002
  2. Appeal decisionRefuse Permission
    11 April 2003
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 2, Manor Park, Palmerstown, Dublin 20?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →