RefusedDecided 17 April 2003South Dublin County Council

11, Palmerstown Close, Dublin 20

Planning application SD02B/0514
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided17 April 2003
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
Two storey extension, that includes a Granny Flat, to the side with minor alterations to existing roof and boundaries to facilitate the development.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
06s.202908Submitted 14 May 2003 / decided 16 September 2003
Appeal decidedRefuse Permission
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference 06s.202908
    14 May 2003
  2. Appeal decisionRefuse Permission
    16 September 2003
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 11, Palmerstown Close, Dublin 20?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →