RefusedDecided 31 January 2005South Dublin County Council

48, Whitechurch Avenue, Ballyboden, Dublin 16.

Planning application SD04A/0904
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided31 January 2005
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
One 2-storey end of terrace house and one new driveway to be used by the existing dwelling.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL. 06S.210953Submitted 22 February 2005 / decided 27 June 2005
Appeal decidedRefuse Permission
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL. 06S.210953
    22 February 2005
  2. Appeal decisionRefuse Permission
    27 June 2005
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 48, Whitechurch Avenue, Ballyboden, Dublin 16.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →