GrantedDecided 02 March 2007South Dublin County Council

121A, Butterfield Park, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16

Planning application SD06A/0554
DecisionGrant permission
Decided02 March 2007
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
Construction of a 2 storey, 3 bedroom semi-detached house to side with new site entrance and replacement of flat roof to front of No. 121A with a pitched roof.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL06S.222676Submitted 29 March 2007 / decided 27 September 2007
Appeal decidedGrant Permission
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL06S.222676
    29 March 2007
  2. Appeal decisionGrant Permission
    27 September 2007
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 121A, Butterfield Park, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →