RefusedDecided 27 June 2012South Dublin County Council

142, Monalea Grove, Dublin 24

Planning application SD12B/0052
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided27 June 2012
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
An attic conversion to hobby room with alterations to the existing Hipped roof and construction of a gable wall with window and Velux rooflights to the front and rear and all associated site works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL06S.240885Submitted 24 July 2012 / decided 16 November 2012
Appeal decidedGrant Permission
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL06S.240885
    24 July 2012
  2. Appeal decisionGrant Permission
    16 November 2012
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 142, Monalea Grove, Dublin 24?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →