RefusedDecided 05 July 2013South Dublin County Council

3, Chestnut Grove, Dublin 24

Planning application SD13B/0026
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided05 July 2013
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
Two storey extension onto the existing gable with additional bedroom space at first floor and extension to both living room and kitchen areas at ground floor.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL06S.242296Submitted 01 August 2013 / decided 20 November 2013
Appeal decidedGrant Permission
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL06S.242296
    01 August 2013
  2. Appeal decisionGrant Permission
    20 November 2013
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 3, Chestnut Grove, Dublin 24?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →