RefusedDecided 02 November 2017South Dublin County Council

'St. Roch', Taylors Lane, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16

Planning application SD17A/0325
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided02 November 2017
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
The refurbishment of existing 2 storey semi-detached dwelling (a Protected Structure) and construction of 2 semi-detached, 3 storey dwellings with 2 new vehicular entrances to Taylors Lane, 2 car spaces per dwelling in front gardens, boundary walls, landscaping of site and associated works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 'St. Roch', Taylors Lane, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →