52, Carrigmore Drive, Aylesbury Dublin 24 — planning permission granted (SD23B/0405) / PlanIntel

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.

Provision of a ground floor extension only to the front of the property and all associated site works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Application ref: SD23B/0405
Received: 24 November 2023
Decided: 07 December 2023
FI requested: Yes

Authority: South Dublin County Council
Application type: Permission
Outcome: Grant permission
Source status: Documents indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 52, Carrigmore Drive, Aylesbury Dublin 24?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Get my site risk brief

Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Included in site brief

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Unlock for €39 incl. VAT Or read every file with Pro

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.

Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →