GrantedDecided 10 December 2024South Dublin County Council

17, College Park, Terenure, Dublin 6W, D6W CA47

Planning application SD24B/0487W
DecisionGrant permission
Decided10 December 2024
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by South Dublin County Council.
1) Proposed single storey extension to the rear, to include a low pitch zinc roof with rooflight. Re-use of existing doors to form new sun room; 2) New glazed roof & enclosed store to side passage; 3) New extended terrace using existing paving slabs; 4) Internal alterations and all associated site and drainage works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for South Dublin has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 17, College Park, Terenure, Dublin 6W, D6W CA47?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →