GrantedDecided 13 July 2017Tipperary County Council

Rosegreen, Co. Tipperary

Planning application 17600285
DecisionConditional grant
Decided13 July 2017
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
(i) existing on site lighting and associated site works and also Planning Permission for (ii) Reconfiguration of the existing grounds so as to have two pitches and a new all weather pitch, (iii) a vehicular & pedestrian entrance from the existing Local Authority car park, (iv) connection to Local Authority foul sewer (v) walkway (vi) lighting (vii) playground (viii) fencing (ix) car parking (x) closing up of one existing vehicular entrance (xi) the relocation of the second existing vehicular entrance & construction of a new entrance structure and (xii) all site development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Rosegreen, Co. Tipperary?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →