GrantedDecided 02 October 2017Tipperary County Council

Cathedral Street, Thurles

Planning application 17600894
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 October 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
Construction of an extension to existing shop consisting of the following: 1) demolish the existing store and wc at ground floor, 2) construct a single storey extension to the rear of shop along with internal alterations consisting of store rooms, staff room, and staff wc, 3) minor elevational alterations consisting of relocating existing door, proposed new door and construct 2 no. new window opes to the rear (south facing), along with raising of existing roof to match adjoining neighbouring buildings to the rear of premises (south facing); with all associated and ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cathedral Street, Thurles?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →