RefusedDecided 24 January 2018Tipperary County Council

Lisnageenly, Silvermines, Nenagh

Planning application 17601104
DecisionRefused
Decided24 January 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
Construction of a new residential entrance to property and new site boundaries from those granted under previous planning permission Pl Ref 10510422 along with all ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-300954-18Submitted 15 February 2018 / decided 12 June 2018
Status not recordedREFUSED
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-300954-18
    15 February 2018
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSED
    12 June 2018
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Lisnageenly, Silvermines, Nenagh?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →