GrantedDecided 02 May 2018Tipperary County Council

Beechmount, Foulkstown Td, Fethard E91 FK84

Planning application 18600321
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 May 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
The following developments and retentions to existing milk processing dairy facility 1) single storey 1 bay extension to existing offices 2) single storey 4 bay extension to existing storage and despatch facilities to include new loading bay and staff WC 3) canopy over milk intake area 4) associated site works, and the relocation of attic access stairs to north face of building 5) retention of as-built boiler house and enclosure to cleaning system tank facilities at rear of existing production area. The proposed development is within the curtilage of a protected structure (Ref S075)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Beechmount, Foulkstown Td, Fethard E91 FK84?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →