GrantedDecided 12 July 2018Tipperary County Council

Lisbryan, Ballingarry, Roscrea

Planning application 18600657
DecisionConditional grant
Decided12 July 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
Erection of agricultural structure to include (1) a cubicle shed with adjacent concrete aprons, (2) a building containing milking parlour, dairy, ancillary store/plant and handling yard, with adjacent collecting yard and exit yards, (3) meal storage bin, (4) a geomembrane lined slurry store and effluent collection/transfer channels, (5) upgrade existing entrance & access road & provide vehicle hardstand area, including all associated works. The proposed development is located adjacent to the curtilage of recorded protected structure S244, Lisbryan House & Recorded National Monument TN007-042 (Ringfort)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Lisbryan, Ballingarry, Roscrea?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →