GrantedDecided 11 October 2019Tipperary County Council

Crosscannon, Killenaule, Co. Tipperary

Planning application 19600932
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 October 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
1 no. 10m high flood light at existing hurling wall including green wire fencing here 2.1m high, also to retain 1 no. 8m high flood light at existing car parking area, also to retain 4 no. ball-stopping nets 12m high on playing pitches. Planning Permission to construct a new covered spectator setting stand The development is also to include new player changing rooms and public toilet facilities pavilion, 2 no. new 20m high flood lights at playing pitch no. 1, 2 no. new 8m high flood lights at existing car parking area, connect to all existing services and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Crosscannon, Killenaule, Co. Tipperary?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →