GrantedDecided 22 October 2019Tipperary County Council

No 12 Sarsfield Street, Slieve Na Mban Meadows (Slievenamon Meadows), Davis Road

Planning application 19600957
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 October 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
Construction of 4 in total, 3 bedroom, 2 storey terraced dwellinghouses with entrances onto to Slieve Na Mban Meadows (Slievenamon Meadows), & Pedestrian entrances onto Davis Road, Demolition of boundary wall, new public footpath, street light, boundary walls/fences, connection to mains water supply, connection to mains sewer and mains storm water drain, solar panels on the roof of those dwelling houses and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-305908-19Submitted 14 November 2019 / decided 10 March 2020
Status not recordedMODIFIED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No 12 Sarsfield Street, Slieve Na Mban Meadows (Slievenamon Meadows), Davis Road?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →