GrantedDecided 19 November 2019Tipperary County Council

14 Rosemount, Clongour, Thurles

Planning application 19601080
DecisionConditional grant
Decided19 November 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
As constructed converted attic to storage room accessed via a fixed permanent stair at first floor level, flipping of double door and window on sun room on ground floor from original permitted Ref No 05510027, minor internal and external alteration to ground floor and rear elevations (i.e. utility room, WC and boiler room) from original permission Ref 05510027, an open shed to store bicycles and garden tools to the rear of the site, a brick faced store to rear to store woodchip fuel for the heating system with all associated site work and ancillary works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 14 Rosemount, Clongour, Thurles?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →