GrantedDecided 31 March 2020Tipperary County Council

Leigh, Two Mile Borris, Thurles

Planning application 20156
DecisionConditional grant
Decided31 March 2020
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
As constructed dwelling, previously approved under planning reference 18600512, changes to include: reduced footprint at north west corner of house (omission of bay that previously accommodated a bedroom/play area to ground floor and omission of bedroom no. 2 on first floor), modifications to internal layout over 2 floors to accommodate reduced floor area, omission of stone facing to all areas proposed apart from bay window over 2 floors on south elevation, omission of window to ground floor on south elevation between living room and dining room, omission of 3 no. rooflights and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Leigh, Two Mile Borris, Thurles?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →