RefusedDecided 29 July 2021Tipperary County Council

29 Fr. Mathew Terrace, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary

Planning application 21354
DecisionRefused
Decided29 July 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
The extension of the existing property in the form of a first storey addition over the existing single story flat roof to the rear of the property with associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-311211-21Submitted 24 August 2021 / decided 13 December 2022
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-311211-21
    24 August 2021
  2. Appeal decisionCONDITIONAL
    13 December 2022
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 29 Fr. Mathew Terrace, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →