GrantedDecided 01 April 2026Tipperary County Council

Pallas Street, Borrisoland South, Borrisoleigh Co. Tipperary

Planning application 2560614
DecisionConditional grant
Decided01 April 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
Change of use of existing former Convent of Mercy building, from office use to a single residence, proposed works consist of internal alterations, replacement of existing PVC windows with traditional timber windows and replacement services throughout and create a new vehicle entrance to Pallas St. along with PERMISSION for RETENTION of existing domestic store together with all associated site works - the former Convent of Mercy is a Recorded Protected Structure in the Tipperary County Development Plan TRPS S440, NIAH 22309020

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Pallas Street, Borrisoland South, Borrisoleigh Co. Tipperary?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →