GrantedDecided 11 April 2017Waterford City and County Council

Coach House, Kilmacthomas Workhouse, Union Road Carraignanonshagh

Planning application 17106
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 April 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
Proposed works include: Change of use from existing 58m2 mixed use accommodation to café use including light-fare food preparation area and service counter, removal of non-historic partitions, replacement of non-historic windows, construction of a new external deck area, construction of new 106m2 café building ancillary to existing building incorporating customer toilets and ancillary kitchen service space and a new waste water treatment and percolation area (A Protected Structure RPS 122)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Coach House, Kilmacthomas Workhouse, Union Road Carraignanonshagh?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →