GrantedDecided 02 March 2017Waterford City and County Council

Pembrokestown House, Gaulstown, Co. Waterford

Planning application 1716
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 March 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
The following works to the main dwelling house - a protected structure. The works will consist of the removal of glazed extension to east elevation and reinstatement of two no. windows in existing opes; the replacement of entrance door and screen to north elevation; the alteration to ground floor plan with removal of internal masonry wall; the alteration to first floor plan with removal of recent partition walls; the restoration and repair to existing building fabric including re-slating of roofs and replacement of external render; and ancillary works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Pembrokestown House, Gaulstown, Co. Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →