RefusedDecided 08 March 2018Waterford City and County Council

Cluain Lárach, Knockenduff, Tramore

Planning application 17693
DecisionRefused
Decided08 March 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
To build 73 houses (no.35 to 105 and no.120&121)_consisting of 3 & 4 bedroom, two storey, semi-detached and detached houses, 2 bedroom two storey, semi detached and terraced houses. Also planning permission for alterations to planning ref. 16/675 to build house no. 127_two storey 4 bedroom detached house (one house in lieu of the previously omitted houses 122 & 123 _ dotted on layout plan), a relocation of houses 128 & 129 and a modification to the layout of Road no. 7, 7a and 7b, together with all associated site development works and all associated services installation, built and occupied under Ref. no. 10/439 _ extended under Ref. No. 16/390). Phase 2 (14 houses built and occupied under Ref. no. 17/18) and Phase 3 (44 houses under construction under Ref. No. 16/675). This application to form Phase 4 of housing development

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cluain Lárach, Knockenduff, Tramore?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →