GrantedDecided 06 June 2019Waterford City and County Council

Glasha, Ballymacarbry, Co. Waterford

Planning application 19262
DecisionConditional grant
Decided06 June 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
(1) the change of use of the original shed to the southern side of the original house to domestic use (2) the construction of a single storey extension to the existing original house (3) changes to the original house including dormer style gables over 3 no. front first floor windows, a porch and an external door to the rear (4) 11 No. velux type windows to the front and rear of the overall house and (5) the installation of a septic tank. Planning permission is required for an upgraded waste water treatment system along with all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Glasha, Ballymacarbry, Co. Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →