GrantedDecided 01 August 2019Waterford City and County Council

Gracedieu Road, Gracedieu, Waterford

Planning application 19412
DecisionConditional grant
Decided01 August 2019
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
EXTENSION OF DURATION OF 14600119: to demolish existing single storey, lean-to roofed, old agricultural storage building and existing roadside boundary wall and planning permission to build two detached two storey houses (No. 1 and No. 2 of Planning Ref no. 12500066), together with associated siteworks, including twinned recessed entrances and new roadside boundary wall along Gracedieu Road and also the provision of associated services, which includes connection into existing foul drainage main and connection from existing public water main

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Gracedieu Road, Gracedieu, Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →