GrantedDecided 01 September 2020Waterford City and County Council

Unit 424 - 425 IDA Industrial Estate, Cork Road, Waterford

Planning application 20259
DecisionConditional grant
Decided01 September 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
For alterations to the previously approved planning permission reg. ref. no. 09/291: 1. The provision of single storey extension (23sqm) to previously approved Production Area 2. Minor alterations to the previously approved elevations 3. The provision of new enclosure to the approved external spiral stairs structure 4. Minor alterations to the previously approved roof plant screening 5. Minor alterations to the previously approved northern entrance. All to include all associated site works and drainage

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Unit 424 - 425 IDA Industrial Estate, Cork Road, Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →