RefusedDecided 21 December 2021Waterford City and County Council

Ardoginna, Ardmore, County Waterford

Planning application 211016
DecisionRefused
Decided21 December 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
INDEFINITE RETENTION of the septic tank system including the distribution chamber and percolation area to service the existing holiday chalet on our site

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-312596-22Submitted 26 January 2022 / decided 01 June 2023
Status not recordedREFUSED
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-312596-22
    26 January 2022
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSED
    01 June 2023
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Ardoginna, Ardmore, County Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →