GrantedDecided 03 June 2021Waterford City and County Council

Jitterbeans, Main Street, Dungarvan

Planning application 21363
DecisionConditional grant
Decided03 June 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
Section 254 Licence Application - outdoor dining at the following 2 locations - Location 1; dining area with surrounding screen shelter and canopy covering from rain only and 6 tall tables - located opposite Jitterbeans Deli and 2 carpark spaces outside Credit Union and James Mans Shop, 2-3 Parnell Street. Location 2: - 3 x semi circle Shannon tall table tops to be directly attached to the poles/bollards on the footpath directly outside Jitterbeans Deli Shop on 65 Main Street, Dungarvan, to be off set from the road side of the bollard

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Jitterbeans, Main Street, Dungarvan?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →