RefusedDecided 23 September 2021Waterford City and County Council

'Ballyloughmore', Woodstown, Co Waterford

Planning application 21379
DecisionRefused
Decided23 September 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
Indefinite retention of the following works as carried out (1) replacement wall for the removed roadside fence, recessed entrance with its piers and gate together with its internal driveway (2) office attached to garage (3) mono pitched shed housing the recovery truck, permission for (a) roof over yard area on west side of garage to form store and (b) add matching brick to the block road boundary wall and piers. All of the above to include any site works necessary to complete the projects. The works have been and to be carried out on my property at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 'Ballyloughmore', Woodstown, Co Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →