GrantedDecided 04 May 2021Waterford City and County Council

Unit 609 Northern Extension, Waterford Industrial Park, Waterford

Planning application 2157
DecisionConditional grant
Decided04 May 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
For two storey extension to west elevation of existing building comprising 82.1sq.m on ground floor and 173.4 sq.m on first floor to accommodate new shipping area and offices and minor alterations to existing building including removal of double doors and replacement with window to match existing on front southern elevation, new external door on eastern side elevation and alterations to existing security fencing comprising relocation of gates and new pedestrian gate on southern front boundary, together with all associated site works at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Unit 609 Northern Extension, Waterford Industrial Park, Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →