GrantedDecided 16 June 2022Waterford City and County Council

The Cloisters, Farrangarret, Ardmore

Planning application 21604
DecisionConditional grant
Decided16 June 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
The construction of 35 no. dwellings consisting of 1 no. 2-storey detached 4-bed dwelling, 4 no. 2-storey semi-detached 4-bed dwellings, 26 no. 2-storey semi-detached 3-bed dwellings, 2 no. 2-storey mid-terraced 3-bed dwellings and 2 no. end-terrace 3-bed dwellings, new landscaping and boundary treatments, public walkway with lighting from proposed development to Tower Hill, connection to existing estate road (The Cloisters) together with all associated site works and foul & surface water drainage connections

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-314043-22Submitted 11 July 2022 / decided 17 July 2024
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Cloisters, Farrangarret, Ardmore?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →