GrantedDecided 31 March 2021Waterford City and County Council

Pickardstown House, Pickardstown, Tramore

Planning application 2192
DecisionConditional grant
Decided31 March 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
To renovate, works include demolition of the centre first floor room on the south east side to create a terrace off the kitchen and construction of a second terrace off the proposed conservatory, removal of the old flat roof and replacement with a full slatted version up to a new ridge height, removal of old porch on the north west elevation, new external access to the lower floor on the north west elevation, installation of a septic tank and percolation area, general adjustments to window opes to aid habitability, extensive landscaping, and associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Pickardstown House, Pickardstown, Tramore?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →