GrantedDecided 02 December 2021Waterford City and County Council

4 Wolfe Tone Road, Dungarvan, Co Waterford

Planning application 21950
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 December 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
Indefinite retention of alterations to existing dwelling house to include 1. Removal of a rear elevation flat roof extending from original ridge level. 2. Raising of roof ridge level. 3. Replacement of 2 no. 1st floor windows to front elevation with 2 no. raised dormer windows. 4. Lowering of wall plate level to rear elevation, constructing sloped roof structure and installation of 1 no. dormer projection with a velux rooflight and 5. Alterations to height of front elevation ground floor window ope and widening of front elevation doorway at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 4 Wolfe Tone Road, Dungarvan, Co Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →