GrantedDecided 18 July 2022Waterford City and County Council

Units 2 & 3, Seapoint Business Park, Tramore

Planning application 22450
DecisionConditional grant
Decided18 July 2022
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
RETENTION PERMISSION for an extension to the permitted first floor area of Units 2 & 3, the amalgamation of Unit 2 into Unit 3 at first floor level and the provision of a connecting doorway to same. PLANNING PERMISSION for changes to the elevations of Unit 3 consisting of the removal of existing double doors on front elevation, alterations to the ope size and the fitting of a new window. PERMISSION also for the installation of 3 no. new windows on the side elevation along with 1 no. new single door on the rear elevation

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Units 2 & 3, Seapoint Business Park, Tramore?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →