GrantedDecided 20 September 2023Waterford City and County Council

Ballyvalloona, Faha, Co. Waterford

Planning application 23210
DecisionConditional grant
Decided20 September 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
To convert and extend existing garage to a granny flat with a link to the existing house and form a roof garden to new flat roof extension to dwelling house with surface water connected to existing surface water gulley and soakaway and new WC connected to existing septic tank with alterations to existing kitchen windows and internal walls, new full length glazing to kitchen gable wall, install new velux rooflight to entrance hall roof at, install new front door with full length side glazing panels with all associated site works to dwelling house

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Ballyvalloona, Faha, Co. Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →