GrantedDecided 08 July 2024Waterford City and County Council

Green Road, Faithlegg, Co. Waterford

Planning application 2460275
DecisionConditional grant
Decided08 July 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
To construct a single storey extension to the rear of existing dwelling, works will also include elevation changes to the existing house including: 1. removal of a window from the existing western gable, 2. remove a window from the northern elevation and replace with a new access door, 3. remove a door from the existing utility room, 4. Remove a window from the existing Shower room and 5. reposition and enlarge the existing sliding door and to create a new sliding door in the eastern elevation along with all site development works required for development

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Green Road, Faithlegg, Co. Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →