GrantedDecided 22 July 2024Waterford City and County Council

Kilmeaden Station, Kilmeaden, Co Waterford

Planning application 2460316
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 July 2024
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
For an existing store and PERMISSION for the removal of existing stores and office, the construction of an extension to the existing train shed to include toilet facilities and associated track work, service pit, water towers, coal bunker and ash pit all to accommodate a steam train and for The development will also include a new stores building, office accommodation, a signal hut, the erection of a historic manual goods crane and all associated site works including a foul drain from the train shed to the existing foul drainage system.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Kilmeaden Station, Kilmeaden, Co Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →