GrantedDecided 15 December 2025Waterford City and County Council

4 Pleasant Drive, Mount Pleasant, Waterford

Planning application 2560695
DecisionConditional grant
Decided15 December 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
To Construct a first floor Dormer Extension to the rear of the dwelling to provide a habitable bedroom In the existing attic space, bedroom to have access to the flat roof over ground floor extension for small balcony, for change of use of the existing attic to part of the habitable area of the house, to provide 5no. new roof windows to the rear of the dwelling and 2 no. new roof windows to the front of the dwelling, to construct a ground floor rear extension in two parts with the roof to extend across the entire width of the rear of the dwelling to create a covered area between the two extensions, elevation changes to the existing dwelling and to construct a new boundary fence to the front of the property with a sliding gate and a pedestrian gate along with associated site development works

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 4 Pleasant Drive, Mount Pleasant, Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →