GrantedDecided 06 May 2026Waterford City and County Council

Haughton’s Public House, Ross Kilmeaden, Co. Waterford

Planning application 2660161
DecisionConditional grant
Decided06 May 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Waterford City and County Council.
The demolition of 2 no. external single storey store rooms to the south of the existing Public House and the construction of a new extension to the rear of our existing Public House comprising the construction of a new single storey residential accommodation to the rear (south) of the existing Public House together with connection to the existing on-site septic tank and percolation area together with all ancillary and associated site works all as previously granted under planning permission reference no. 21/35

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Waterford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Haughton’s Public House, Ross Kilmeaden, Co. Waterford?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →